- About PS&F
- Industry Focus
- Client Tools
- Education & Events
October 12, 2015
President Obama has signed legislation recently passed by Congress which changes how “small group” health insurance will be defined for rating and underwriting purposes. Previously, under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), a small group was scheduled to be defined as employers with fewer than 100 employees beginning in 2016. The PACE Act now defines a small employer as one that employed an average of not more than 50 employees on business days during the preceding calendar year. However, the act also gives states the option to define the small group market differently in each state. Most states are expected to move forward defining small groups as employers with no more than 50 employees, as was common prior to the ACA.
The ACA made significant changes to the benefits, underwriting, and rating rules that apply to the small group health insurance market. Prior to the ACA, small group health insurance was principally regulated by state insurance law. Changes imposed by the ACA included among other things;
These rules apply to all small group health plans, not just those sold through a state or federal Exchange.
The ACA also expanded the definition of a “small employer” to employers with less than 100 full-time equivalents (FTEs) beginning in 2016. Prior to this planned expansion, most state insurances defined a small employer as an employer with less than 50 employees. The definition of how employees were counted also varied from state to state.
What Does the PACE Act Do?
The act defines a small employer as one that employed an average of not more than 50 employees on business days during the preceding calendar year.
It is important to note that this change does not affect the ACA rules determining if an employer is considered an “applicable large employer” (ALE) for purposes of the §4980H employer shared responsibility rules (often called the play or pay rules). An ALE is an employer with 50 or more FTEs, and this ALE definition will not be affected by state small group definition changes.
How are States Reacting?
We have been notified by the Director of Insurance that Alaska will keep the definition of small group as under 50 employees.
The Oregon Insurance Division (OID) is taking steps to solicit rapid stakeholder input, a necessary precursor to the emergency rulemaking that would be required to change the definition of “small group”. The key question, from OID’s perspective, is whether it is now “too late” to change course. A final decision is expected soon.
In Washington State, Insurance Commissioner Kreidler has stated that he “will support the President’s decision (to continue to define “small group as 1-50 employees) and implement the new change in Washington state as smoothly as possible”. So whereas we thought the small group rules would pertain to groups from 1-100, they will still only apply to groups of 1-50. Confused yet? Well, so are the insurance carriers, who likely have already developed their products and rate filings off the expected rule change. This may delay renewals for January 1st in the 51-100 size range. We are talking with the insurance carriers and will keep you appraised as we learn more.
Obviously, employers with well over 100 employees are not affected by this act, and employers with under 50 employees would generally be considered part of the small group market regardless of these changes. Employers in the range of 50-100 employees will need to consult with their employee benefits advisors and health insurance carriers to determine how this may impact their benefits and rates going forward.
As always, should you have any questions, please contact your opens in a new windowParker, Smith & Feek Benefits Team.
While every effort has been taken in compiling this information to ensure that its contents are totally accurate, neither the publisher nor the author can accept liability for any inaccuracies or changed circumstances of any information herein or for the consequences of any reliance placed upon it. This publication is distributed on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice or services. Readers should always seek professional advice before entering into any commitments.
The views and opinions expressed within are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Parker, Smith & Feek. While every effort has been taken in compiling this information to ensure that its contents are totally accurate, neither the publisher nor the author can accept liability for any inaccuracies or changed circumstances of any information herein or for the consequences of any reliance placed upon it.